Exact(14)
Tukey's test at a level of 5% of probability was applied between different treatments.
Tukey's test at a level of 5% of probability was applied.
If one works with the whole data set of 8760 wind speeds per year, the critical value in the Kolmogorov Smirnov test at a level of significance of 5% is given by (1.358/sqrt{8,760}approx 0.0145), i.e. for the supremum of deviations below this value, the hypothesis is accepted that the calculated CDF is the true CDF of the wind speeds as random variable.
Based on data of assay variability of the key proteins of chronic AP of complement activation (C3d, Ba, SC5b-9) derived from our laboratory [35], [36], the study was designed to detect a difference of 2/3 of a standard deviation between cases and controls with a power of at least 90%, with a two sided test at a level of α = 0.05/3.
RDT results were compared (paired proportions) with the McNemar test, at a level of significance (P) of 0.05.
The significance level was determined by using the false discovery rate (FDR) test at a level of 0.05 [ 33], which allows type-I error detection.
Similar(46)
But in general, even professional lie-catchers, like judges and customs officials, perform, when tested, at a level not much better than chance.
Significant differences between means between groups were determined using Duncan's multiple range tests at a level of p < 0.05.
Scheffe's method was used for the multiple comparison tests at a level of 95%. Figure 2 illustrates the FESEM images of the electrospun PLGA/nHA-I, PLGA/nHA, and pristine PLGA nanofibers scaffolds.
Requiring a power (1-β) of 0.80 for detection of such an effect with a two-sided unpaired t-test (at a level of α = 0.05) leads to a sample size of 68 per arm (active vs. sham).
Statistical significance was tested at a level of 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com