terms agreed

USAGE SUMMARY

"terms agreed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when two parties reach an agreement on a particular matter. Example: After much negotiation, the two business partners agreed on the terms and shook hands.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Default Failure to repay a loan according to the terms agreed to in the promissory note.

University of California, Berkeley

Any terms agreed to with Mr. Almunia would be binding for five years.

The New York Times - Tech

The Contract contains all the terms agreed between you and GNMA.

The Guardian

The Contract contains all the terms agreed between you and GNM.

The Guardian

However, there was a growing backlash from junior doctors over the terms agreed by their union.

The Guardian

Second, to stay in on revised terms agreed with the EU.

The Guardian

Mr Prodi would do well to get the terms agreed on in writing while he is still being courted.

The Economist

But medical leaders claim the NHS pension scheme is in surplus and are refusing to renegotiate terms agreed in 2008.

The Times

Since the referendum, it said it had exchanged 11 long-term retail leases on terms agreed prior to the vote.

The Guardian - Business

9.5 This Agreement represents the entire terms agreed between the parties in relation to its subject matter.

The Guardian

Other defendants in the WorldCom litigation have 45 days to agree to settlements on the terms agreed to by Citigroup.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, ensure that the phrase clearly modifies a specific entity, such as a loan, a contract, or a settlement, to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "terms agree" when you intend to describe a completed state. For example, saying "the terms agree with the law" is a subject-verb relationship, whereas "the terms agreed upon" refers to the specific set of conditions. If you are describing the final state of a deal, always use the past participle form.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "terms agreed" primarily functions as a post-positive modifier or a reduced relative clause. In many instances found in Ludwig, it acts as a concise way to say "the terms that were agreed." It is frequently used as the object of a preposition (e.g., "under the terms agreed") or as part of a compound subject. Ludwig AI confirms its status as a correct and highly functional component of English syntax.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Science

6%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In conclusion, "terms agreed" is a robust and essential phrase in professional English. Ludwig data demonstrates its prevalence across News & Media, Legal, and Academic sectors, where it serves as a precise tool for referencing finalized negotiations. Whether used in the context of international diplomacy (e.g., EU withdrawal terms) or corporate finance (e.g., loan repayment conditions), the phrase consistently implies a binding and settled state. Ludwig AI identifies it as fully correct, noting that its utility lies in its conciseness. Writers should feel confident using it in formal reports, articles, and legal documents to denote clarity and closure in agreements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreed terms

Uses the participle as a direct adjective preceding the noun for a more standard noun phrase structure.

conditions established

Replaces terms with conditions to emphasize the specific requirements or state of the deal.

terms of the deal

Uses a prepositional structure to define the scope of a specific business or political transaction.

negotiated conditions

Highlights the process of discussion and compromise that led to the final state.

stipulations reached

A more formal and legalistic alternative often used in formal contracts or judicial proceedings.

agreed-upon parameters

Adds precision by implying the specific boundaries or limits within which the agreement operates.

provisions settled

Focuses on the individual clauses or rules within an agreement that have been finalized.

contractual obligations

Specifically refers to the legal duties that arise once terms are finalized.

set requirements

A simpler alternative that focuses on the mandatory nature of the finalized terms.

mutual understanding

Softens the language to focus on the shared intent rather than specific technical clauses.

FAQs

How to use "terms agreed" in a sentence?

You can use "terms agreed" to refer to finalized conditions, for example: "The company must operate within the <a href="/s/terms+agreed+upon" target="_blank" rel="alternative">terms agreed upon during the merger."

What is the difference between "terms agreed" and "agreed terms"?

Both are correct, but "<a href="/s/agreed+terms" target="_blank" rel="alternative">agreed terms" functions as a standard adjective-noun pair, while "terms agreed" is often a shortened form of a relative clause like "the terms that were agreed".

Can I say "conditions met" instead?

Not exactly. "<a href="/s/conditions+met" target="_blank" rel="alternative">conditions met" refers to requirements that have been fulfilled, whereas "terms agreed" refers to the rules that were established in the first place.

Is "terms agreed" formal enough for a contract?

Yes, but in very formal legal writing, you might prefer "<a href="/s/terms+of+the+agreement" target="_blank" rel="alternative">terms of the agreement" or "<a href="/s/stipulations+herein" target="_blank" rel="alternative">stipulations herein" for absolute clarity.