Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The first term in formula (11) represents the difference between the projection of the reconstructed projection and the measured projection, that is, the data fidelity item; the second term is the wavelet sparse transformation constraint term; the third term is the total variation difference constraint term.
This statement is true since the integrated term in formula 1994, for given, is the same for and but r1 does not appear in.
Similar(58)
So these are both called Rydberg formulas for figuring out the frequency of light emitted or absorbed, and before we were looking at the Rydberg formula specifically for the hydrogen atom, and now that we have this z squared term in the formula here, we're now talking about absolutely any one electron atom.
One can see that (a) if I − µT > 0 (i.e., SBT is small relative to the true FRET signal), then the last term in the formula is very small and 〈 F 〉 ≈ I − μ T in agreement with Gordons' formula; (b) even if I − µT < 0 (i.e., SBT is large relative to the true FRET signal or the FRET signal is absent), the Equation 2 always gives small, but positive values.
This is mainly due to a term in the formula not expressible in mathematically closed form.
Owing to the presence of the n1/2 term in the formula for an interval estimate, the sample size affects the margin of error.
The last term in the formula captures time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity and is discussed below.
The first term in the formula (3) is consistent with the equation (4) in Ref. [20] for a percolation radius, ( {R}_{mathrm{perc}}=frac{a}{sqrt[3]{n}}. ).
If is an even function, then the third term in the formula of vanishes, while the sum of the first two items provides a singular Sturm-Liouville operator.
The first term in the formula corresponds to energy consumed for carrying out the computation (dynamic power), and the second term represents energy for the static power consumption during the entire period of execution.
The first term in the formula indicates the elasticity of the wall, that is, the rate of deformation of the tube wall with the pressure and the change rate of the transverse section of the pipe along with the axial direction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com