Sentence examples for tenuous distinction from inspiring English sources
The phrase "tenuous distinction" is correct and can be used in written English
It is often used to describe a subtle or thin difference between two things or concepts. Example: The tenuous distinction between art and pornography has been hotly debated for centuries.
One hindrance to the formulation of a rational policy about drugs is the often tenuous distinction between the natural and the artificial.
It is sometimes said that in extortion the victim consents, although under duress, while in robbery his will is overwhelmed so that there is no consent; but this is an extremely tenuous distinction.
A complex interaction between the authors of primary and secondary literature, generated in part by the tenuous distinction between treatment and enhancement that sets the premise for the CE debate, and in part by the presence of widespread expectations and social pressures, may contribute to this phenomenon.
It is almost as tenuous as the distinction I might make between our respective birthplaces.
We say "He kissed the bride," so we ask "Who kissed the bride?" We say "Henry kissed her," so we ask "Whom did Henry kiss?" But even after a century of nagging by prescriptive grammarians, the "who whom" distinction remains tenuous in speech and informal writing.
If those distinctions strike you as tenuous, you're not alone.
What's more, the distinction itself between artist and scientist was tenuous, at best.
For D. simulans, making a distinction between demography and selection is more tenuous, especially given that there are no comparable estimates of the demographic history within Africa for this species.
The next two sections deal with behavioral genetics and molecular genetics respectively, and make clear how tenuous the connections are between these fields and the innate/acquired distinction.
Yet the distinction between casual partners and boyfriends was often tenuous and some said they would use condoms with casual partners but not with partners classed as boyfriends, even when they had relatively short relationships with them.
The legal distinction between Gates' position and Craddock's order might seem tenuous, but it is simply that Gates did not preclude the need for evidence to assassinate civilians in the drug trade, and Craddock granted carte blanche to commit masses of summary executions of the usual suspects sans, "intelligence or other evidence".
