Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The argument that the result is a simple and direct consequence of the maximum principle is, in our viewpoint, not tenable.
If this viewpoint was ever tenable, it has since been conclusively invalidated by scholars.
This absolutely negative viewpoint of reactive astrogliosis is no longer tenable and it is now clear from many different lines of experimental evidence that there is a normal process of reactive astrogliosis that exerts essential beneficial functions and does not do harm.
Thus, Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell say of definitions in particular, those used in Principia Mathematica that they are "strictly speaking, typographical conveniences (1925, 11)." This viewpoint has plausibility only for regular homogeneous definitions though it is not really tenable even here.
Which solutions are tenable?
But is it tenable?
Is the distinction tenable?
This is no longer tenable.
His position is not tenable.
But the prospect seems tenable.
Well, that's not a tenable position.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com