Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Figure 2 SEM images of Co/Pd multilayers on AAO templates with average pore diameter of 185 nm.
Ferromagnetic nanostructures have been electrodeposited within the pores of porous silicon templates with average pore diameters between 25 and 60 nm.
The cross-sectional SEM image of the Co/Pd multilayers was showed in Figure 2c. Figure 1 SEM images of the AAO templates with average pore diameters.
By making use of an e-beam deposition system, the [Co(2 Å)/Pd(10 Å)]15 multilayers were prepared on a Si(100) substrate and anodized aluminum oxide [AAO] templates with average pore diameters of around 185, 95, and 40 nm.
Similar(56)
Herein, we report the preparation of carbon nanofibers containing linear mesocage arrays via evaporation induced self-assembly method within AAO template with average channel diameter of 25 nm.
Samples with the average grain size of 13, 14, 18.5 and 21 nm respectively produce alumina templates with an average pore size of 8.5, 10, 15 and 16 nm in that order which shows the average grain size limits the average pore diameter in the resulting template.
For example, templates with an average length of 109 bp were sequenced 6-fold more frequently than templates that averaged 286 bp in length and DNA templates 350 bp or longer were rarely sequenced.
The AAO templates with an average pore diameter of 25 nm were prepared by anodizing aluminum foil (purity 99.5%) at 20 V in 0.5 M sulfuric acid solution.
In summary, we have demonstrated the synthesis of carbon nanofibers containing linear mesocages arrays using AAO templates with an average channel diameter of 25 nm.
As explained in the experimental section, the template were fabricated by two-step anodization process in phosphoric acid, yielding templates with an average pore depth of 500 nm and pore diameter of 225 nm (Figure 1a).
The AAO templates with an average pore diameter of 200 nm were prepared at 120 V in 0.36 M phosphoric acid, followed by chemical etching with 0.3 M phosphoric acid for 1 h.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com