Thus, while molecular templates from FFPE tissues are of inferior quality as compared to their frozen counterparts, these may still be useable for a lot of recently developed methods for nucleic acid investigation, even microarray profiling and wide genome scans, while the main advantage from using molecular FFPE templates is accurate correlation of results with tissue histology.
In 2007, Hans-Joachim et al. [3] reported that the utilization of surgical template is accurate but limited due to insufficient intermaxillary distance in some cases.
Evidently, these rumors were accurate.
At higher sequence identity (>50%), template-based models can be accurate enough to be useful in virtual ligand screening (Bjelic and Aqvist, 2004; Caffrey et al., 2005), designing site-directed mutagenesis experiments (Skowronek et al., 2006; Wells et al., 2006), small ligand docking prediction, and function prediction (Baker and Sali, 2001; Skolnick et al., 2000).
Therefore, if only lower sequence identity templates were available, these two scoring functions could aid in selecting the most accurate model.
The presence of an adequate number of intact RNA templates was essential for accurate and complete reverse transcription.
However, the estimation of the tumor locations obtained using BSE filtered templates was significantly more accurate on average compared with the Sobel-filtered templates (P < 0.05).
SNP frequencies are not expected to be accurate below 1/N where N is the number of template molecules, and N appears to be about 10 to 50.
To evaluate whether patient-to-image registration with the use of a maxillary template is sufficiently accurate for image guided skull base surgery.
All photographs are accurate.
