Sentence examples for templates we compared from inspiring English sources

Using two different TBM designs (averaging individual differences versus aligning group average templates), we compared the anatomical distribution of brain atrophy in 40 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), 40 healthy elderly controls, and 40 individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), a condition conferring increased risk for AD.

To evaluate the effect of the underlying brain template, we compared localization precision using the individual MRI and the averaged template MRI of the MNI as SMAC-transformed head model for the forward solution (see above).

To assess these forced errors (or template-dependent errors), we compared variant calls by each amplification method at sites of low complexity (mainly TATA repeats).

Using the same templates on both platforms, we compared realignments and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection with an 80 fold average read depth across platforms and samples.

By coregistering male and female brains to our template, we directly compared labeled clones from both sexes (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures).

Further, we compared the templates created from the first and second imaging of the test-retest study and found no significant difference.

We compared DNA templates containing wild type DS (DSwt), DS with substitution mutations in the telomere repeats (DSnm-), or OriP DNA with a 120 bp deletion of the DS (ΔDS) (Fig. 1B).

To determine if each template was being significantly preplayed we compared the proportion of spiking events that individually correlated with that template with the proportion expected by chance (as predicted by a shuffling procedure).

In order to better understand the effect of the proposed template matching methods, we compare the patterns of TIMIT phone accuracies from using the methods of all templates with the KL and LLR local distances against that of the HMM baseline.

We performed in vitro transcription on supercoiled and linear templates and compared the transcript yield (Figure 5).

Increased amplification of DNA templates was observed following WGA; however, no amplification advantage for ssDNA ligase treatment of templates was evident compared to linear templates.