Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
A histogram of the number of sequences versus the percentage sequence identity of the query sequence with the template was plotted and the consistently high-scoring and low-scoring sequences were marked on it (Fig. 4).
Similar(59)
The level of statistical support, which was expressed as the mean value of robustness proportion for internal nodes observed in the template tree, was plotted as a function of the factors to be simulated (Figure 3).
A histogram of the number of sequences versus the sequence identity of the protein with the closest structural template in the dataset was plotted (Fig. 3).
The CT value for each dilution was plotted against the log of the template DNA concentration.
Median was plotted.
was plotted.
When the logarithm of the initial template concentration is plotted on the x axis and the threshold cycle (Ct) is plotted on the y axis, PCR efficiency is calculated according to the following equation [ 26]: PCR efficiency = 1 0 − 1 / slope – 1 Note: all primers are listed 5'-3'.
Templated prostheses sizes were plotted in a histogram accompanied by the normal distribution curve generated in SPSS® for Windows® (SPSS Inc).
Primer efficiencies were determined by using five, 5-fold dilutions of cDNA as template and the resulting Ct values were plotted versus the Log10 of the dilution factor, yielding a straight line, the slope of which was then used in the following equation: Efficiency = 10 (1/m) where m = slope.
All RNAP-DNA interactions having dwell times longer than 0.8 s (experiments in F ) were post-synchronized by RNAP binding (t = 0, circles) and by RNAP run-off (squares), and weight-averaged plots of RNAP binding and run-off were plotted for DNA templates having transcribed segments of different lengths (red − 295 bp; blue − 633 bp; black − 910 bp).
The quantitative distribution of these geographical data can then be plotted on different map templates using the application programming interface (API) provided by the mapping engine.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com