Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The current selection method, based on 2-dimensional template comparison, is inefficient for 3-dimensional complex bones.
Similar(59)
The methods with the same computed metric values and same patterns for template comparison are short listed as clone pairs.
As the published methods with detection algorithms based upon amplitude thresholding and fixed or scaled template comparisons are of limited utility for detection of signals with variable amplitudes and superimposed events that have complex waveforms, previous techniques are not applicable for detection of evoked synaptic events in photostimulation and other similar experimental situations.
SPM procedure requires image normalization to a template before a statistical comparison is done to a control group.
A better comparison is to the Reverse Templates (RT) method, which, like ETA, also creates templates without prior knowledge of functional sites.
Hence the textual comparison is performed on the template code created by the tool.
This major issue of single template comparison has been avoided in our new technique, as an array of filters based upon identified EPSCs from experimental data in the training stage provides a range of templates with variable shapes and durations that potentially match a variety of EPSCs found in experimental recordings.
The moniker followed the "CR7" template but the comparison wasn't all that flattering.
Age-related U.S. child templates used for comparison were created from images that were collected at the McCausland Center for Brain Imaging (MCBI; Sanchez et al., 2012a) and matched-age, M/F control participants from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange database (ABIDE; Di Martino et al., 2014).
As a result, in the template comparisons there was only one valid bit compared, resulting in a false match using raw HD, (HD = 0.0).
Comparison was made between data generated from both templates by the measurement of genotype failure and genotype concordance rates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com