Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Briefly, the PCR contained 1 × LightCycler FastStart DNA Master HybProbe mix (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 0.4 μ M gene specific probes, 0.8 μ M gene specific primers, and 1.5 μl cDNA template adjusted to 20 μl with sterile H2O.
Similar(59)
Process and templates adjusted to new objectives.
All DNA templates were adjusted to a concentration of 50 ng/μl with distilled water for PCR tests.
All single-primer templates were adjusted to the same concentration of 0.001 ng/μL prior to the single-primer amplification test.
Given that ticks were not homogeneously engorged and DNA concentrations differed among tick extracts, DNA templates were adjusted to a stock concentration of 40 50 ng/μL.
The translation reaction mixture contained 70% (v/v) of the supplemented LTE, 10% (v/v) of OE-PCR mixture or 10 nM of the linearized plasmid as a template and was adjusted to the final volume with nuclease-free mQ water (Ambion).
Template input was adjusted to obtain a cluster density of 700 900 K/mm2.
The reaction composition for the first round PCR was 10 μl 10× Titanium Taq PCR Buffer, 8 μl dNTPs (2.5 mM each), 1 μl Titanium Taq, 3 μl FwdHTS Primer (10 μM), 3 μl RevHTS Primer (10 μM) and 50 μg template genomic DNA adjusted to a total of 100 μl with PCR-grade water.
For the purpose of modelling, the ICL3 segments of GPCR templates have been adjusted to match the length of TSHR TMD ICL3, except for squid rhodopsin template.
The PCR contained 1 × PCR Gold buffer (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs each, 0.2 0.4 mM gene specific primers, 1.5 2.5 units of Amplitaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems), and 1 μl cDNA template (MCF7 or BT474) adjusted to 50 μl with sterile H2O.
There are some good C.M.T. (cut, make and trim) houses that merely take your details and create a suit using a standard template that's been slightly adjusted to your specifics.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com