Sentence examples for technology intense from inspiring English sources
The phrase "technology intense" is not standard in written English and may be confusing to readers.
It could be used to describe something that heavily relies on technology, but it is better to use more established terms. Example: "The new software is technology intense, requiring advanced hardware to function properly."
Thanks to improved technology, intense media scrutiny of disasters and the realisation by transport operators that disasters are bad for business, stepping into a plane or a train is a far safer experience than it was in the past.
Paradoxically, despite the evolution of scope technology, intense preoperative anxiety has been reported in earlier [24] as well as in recent years of hysteroscopic development [25].
The unexpectedly low success rate for RNA isolation may be due to various reasons, including use of a technology-intense procedure in community-based offices and, as a result, a strong learning curve effect on the RNA yields and success rate.
This technology brings intense competition that spells rapid decline for any sector, or any country, that fails to keep up".
But the technology faces intense scrutiny from regulators when it comes to manipulating human DNA.
Rapid and continual changes in technology and intense competition not only affect the business, but also have a great impact on development activities.
With rapid changes in technology and intense competition in the business environment the importance of cultivating and sustaining foresight in multiple-product innovation firms has been propelled to unprecedented heights.
The use and reuse of internal space, increased reliance on heat emitting and heat sensitive technology and intense pressure to meet operational targets come together to create specific conjunctions in which air conditioning is seen to be necessary.
2 Considering the benefits of this technology, very intense academic and industrial research activities are on the way to overcome deficits of these materials (e.g. limited lifetimes).
Your editorial framed an important point: farmers deserve access to such critical technologies, and intense competition to serve them.
The economy has grown only enough to give the people of the U.S. about the same amount of basic goods per capita that it gave them in 1946; however, productive technologies with intense impacts on the environment have displaced less destructive ones.
