technical validity

USAGE SUMMARY

'technical validity' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the results of a study or experiment that has been conducted using specific technical standards. For example, "The results of the study demonstrate a high level of technical validity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

cPsychometrics is the field of study consisting in a single psychological attribute (i.e. animal pain) measurement (metrology) with one or multiple items (i.e. behavioral characteristics as part of pain expression) and establishing the validation of the developed measurement method by referencing to its technical validity (also cited as psychometric features).

BMC Veterinary Research

The two nurses first analysed the technical validity of the alarms, and divided the alarms into three categories, technically true, technically false and indeterminable.

BMJ Open

In modern times the presentation of public petitions plays little effective part in parliamentary affairs because most fail to conform to very strict tests of technical validity.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Technical validity was found better with the AWS than DLM for all operators.

Annals of Intensive Care

Secondary endpoints were ETI time, technical validity and qualitative evaluation for each technique.

Annals of Intensive Care

ETI technical validity and adverse events are reported in Tables 3 and 4. The DLM-ETI technical validity appeared higher for experts than for both novice sub-groups (p = 0.0005; Table 3).

Annals of Intensive Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

This study determined the clinical utility of selected methods regardless of some technical validities.

BMC Veterinary Research

The present study represents the continued interest in the conceptual and technical validities of multiple methods for pain assessment in canine OA.

BMC Veterinary Research

The differences in the conceptual and technical validities suggested PVF, CSOM, and MA did not provide the same information on OA pain and physical function, but importantly they should be used and interpreted as a whole.

BMC Veterinary Research

For social validity, the model is also compared with 27 previous delegation models with respect to socio-technical validity parameters derived from social principles already accepted in the human society.

Computers & Security

While the three technical criteria clinical validity, responsiveness and good 'signal-to-noise' are appropriate, many options to measure each are possible.

BMJ Open

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research or technical evaluations, clearly define what criteria are used to establish "technical validity" to avoid ambiguity. Be explicit about the standards or metrics being applied.

Common error

Avoid using "technical validity" as a blanket statement of approval without specifying the scope. Ensure you address specific components or aspects of the technical implementation, rather than making a generic claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "technical validity" functions primarily as a noun phrase, specifying the quality of being factually sound and methodologically rigorous within a technical or scientific context. Ludwig AI confirms the usage of this phrase in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

Formal & Business

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "technical validity" is a phrase used to describe the accuracy and reliability of methods, instruments, or findings within a technical or scientific context. Ludwig AI’s analysis shows that the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used, particularly in scientific and formal business settings. When writing about research or technical evaluations, it's best practice to define what criteria are used to establish "technical validity" to avoid ambiguity. Common errors include overgeneralizing "technical validity" without specifying the scope. Alternative phrases include "technical accuracy" and "technical soundness".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

statistical validity

Focuses on the statistical soundness of the technical aspect.

technical relevance

Shifts the focus to the pertinence and applicability of the technical aspect.

technical veracity

Emphasizes the truthfulness and accuracy of the technical details.

technical rationale

Highlights the underlying reasoning and justification for the technical approach.

technical term

Refers to the accuracy of the technical words employed.

technical effectiveness

Focuses on how well the technical aspect achieves its intended purpose.

technical need

Addresses the necessity and importance of the technical aspect.

technical merit

Emphasizes the value and quality of the technical work.

technical adequacy

Indicates whether the technical aspect meets the minimum required standards.

technical soundness

Focuses on the robustness and reliability of the technical element.

FAQs

How is "technical validity" typically assessed in scientific research?

In scientific research, "technical validity" is often assessed through rigorous testing, replication of results, and comparison against established benchmarks. Researchers also look at factors like sample size, controls, and statistical significance.

What's the difference between "technical validity" and "clinical validity"?

"Technical validity" refers to the accuracy and reliability of the methods or instruments used in a study. "Clinical validity", on the other hand, refers to how well the results of a study can be applied to real-world clinical settings and patient outcomes.

What factors might threaten the "technical validity" of a study?

Factors that can threaten "technical validity" include measurement errors, inadequate sample sizes, poorly designed controls, and biases in data collection or analysis. Flaws in these areas can undermine the reliability and accuracy of the findings.

Are there alternative phrases to "technical validity" that emphasize similar concepts?

Yes, alternative phrases like "technical accuracy", "technical soundness", or "technical reliability" can be used to emphasize similar aspects of validity within a technical context.