Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(48)
We follow the discussion and results of Sparn and coworkers who fit the data using Tc (P) = Tc (0) exp [−γP with γ = 0.44 ± 0.03 GPa−1 [35] 35].
When the reliability of each method was evaluated, no statistical significance could be found between EIA and TC (P = 0.627), EIA and RCCNA (0.200), and RCCNA against TC (0.523).
OVX rats showed significant increase of TC (P < 0.01, versus sham group), but raloxifene prevented ovariectomy-induced increase in TC (P < 0.05, versus OVX).
SUVratio of lesions was significantly higher in AC as compared to TC (p < 0.001).
The anti-annexinV-IgG positivity significantly associated with high levels of TC (p = 0.002) and LDL-C (p = 0.03).
For fitting of the data, we have employed the relation Tc (P) = Tc (0) exp [−0.2γP using γG = + 2 [36].
Similar(12)
and the region of feasible powers considering TPC as P TC : = { p ∈ R + + K : ∥ p ∥ 1 ≤ P t }, (6).
No differences in preferences were found between men and women, apart from a more positive attitude towards TC among men (TC: P=0.02).
On 4DCT, the volume of the TC does not differ significantly between inspiratory and expiratory phases: mean difference 1.1 cm (10% of average TC), p=0.08 (paired t-test).
This synergy can be determined with the below function: {text{Synergy}}(S_{m} ) = frac{{{text{CS}}(S_{m} )}}{{sumlimits_{{p in S_{m} }} {{text{TC}}({ p} )} }}.
It means that the following equation should be established in a coalitional form: {text{TC}}(S_{m} ) le sumlimits_{{p in S_{m} }} {{text{TC}}({ p} )}.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com