Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The factors associated with ineligibility generally involved exclusionary criteria including non-deployment TBI, poor cognition, OEF/OIF deployment < 30 days, and age > 50 years (see Table 4).
Similar(59)
The outcomes following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are still poor, despite the great advances achieved in surgical techniques and intensive care over the past decades.
When asked if a 25-year-old male with severe TBI had a poor neurological prognosis at 1 year, 40% of respondents disagreed/strongly disagreed, 30% had no opinion and 30% agreed/strongly agreed.
If both reasons were all reasonable, we may suggest that the decreased FA probably indicated the original damage to the axon and the increased one indicated the recovery; we also suggested that an increase in FA may indicate more severe TBI correlated with poor clinical outcomes.
A study by Catroppa et al. assessed adaptive functioning 10 years post-injury in children with early TBI and observed poorer adaptive skills for those with more severe injury and behavioral difficulties [13].
Conclusions: After decompressive craniectomy in severe TBI, there was a poor correlation between plasma and MD glucose concentration.
The determinants of poor prognostic TBI outcomes are diverse and include patient age; a GSC score of less than 5; the copresence of polytrauma, such as fractures, abdominal, and thoracic injuries; and delays in access to care [20].
Secondary ischemic insult after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is correlated with poor outcome.
In TBI patients with a poor clinical outcome, CSF levels of NSE were significantly elevated at later time points over the first 5 days post injury.
In the present study, APO2.7 in all leukocyte subsets was significantly higher in both good and poor outcome TBI groups than in the controls on Day 1.
Sustained elevation of ICP is an independent factor of poor outcome after TBI.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com