Sentence examples for tb as compared from inspiring English sources

Significantly higher IFNγ values were obtained from children with active TB as compared to LTBI children.

CFP10-induced IFNγ was increased in TB as compared with ECs but was not significantly different (Table 3).

Our objective was to analyze clinical and demographic risk factors associated with isolation of MDR and XDR TB as compared to susceptible controls, at a tertiary center.

In addition, we observe that as in case with CXCL9, CCL2 levels are raised in severe TB as compared with limited disease in patients with extrapulmonary TB.

When responses between patients with pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB were compared, M. tuberculosis and BCG-induced CCL2 secretion was found to be increased in patients with pulmonary TB as compared with those with less severe localized extrapulmonary TB.

As shown in Figure 4, a significant association was found for INT4 C allele carriage (CC+CG) with increased risk of TB as compared to GG genotype (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04 1.44).

There was a high prevalence of MDR-TB in both new and previously treated patients as compared to the WHO estimated prevalence of MDR-TB in India in 2010, however, we did not find any XDR-TB isolate.

21 Generally, the observed enhancement in performance for PIM-Trip-TB as compared to PIM-EA-TB appears to be due to greater diffusivity selectivity as determined by analysis of the data obtained by the time-lag method for measuring gas permeabilities.

The ratio of IFN-γ/IL-10 and IFN-γ/IL-4 showed a significant increase after treatment in HIV negative TB cases but not in HIV positive TB cases which might indicate prolonged impairment of immune response to TB in HIV positive TB patients as compared to HIV negative tuberculosis patients.

We speculate that higher bacillary load in TB meningitis as compared to ocular TB could have accounted for this variation.

12 Prevalence of HIV infection was 1.65 times higher among extrapulmonary TB cases as compared with pulmonary TB cases in our study (prevalence 0.48% vs 0.29% p value 0.09).