Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Tasks were classified as being specific if they included either testing in real-game situations or under contexts similar to those of real games/competitions (e.g., soccer-specific choice reaction-time tasks using videos of game situations to test soccer players).
Experimenter designed controlled laboratory tasks were classified as laboratory tasks whereas tasks performed during the course of participants' normal daily activities (e.g., sending a postcard, calling back at a pre-arranged time) were classified as naturalistic tasks.
These tasks were classified from 0 to 4, with 0 being the worst and 4 the best performance.
Participants with no need for help in doing both BADL and IADL tasks were classified as no disability.
TaSKs were classified in group II due to the presence of the SIDIW box characteristic for plant group II GSKs [ 23].
Based on the value of the Skin- P TASK, cleaning tasks were classified in different exposure categories as defined by DREAM: "no exposure", "low exposure", "moderate exposure", and "extremely high exposure".
Similar(54)
Tasks are classified in classes (mathcal{CT}={t_{1}, ldots,t_{nc}}) according to their size.
They consider a three-fold classification scheme, where tasks are classified into abstract, routine, and manual.
As a first step, tasks are classified as offloadable or not regarding their characteristics.
In this framework, the many product design and development tasks are classified into management, business and marketing, research and design, manufacturing, and finance and economics.
On the one hand, global tasks are classified according to students' reception regarding administrative and familiarization tasks related to the website (Course view, User, Data view, Download and Data add); and on the other hand, local tasks are associated to the course's main theme by means of pedagogical modules (Glossary, Blog, Forum, Resource, Glossary add, Forum add, and Wiki edit).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com