In these lessons, Teachers T1, T2, and T3 reached student groups and provided them with guidance and questions right after they delivered the cooperative inquiry tasks (Source A).
The SHERPA tool is shown to be particularly helpful in addressing the following tasks: source allocation, governance and the assessment of scenario impacts.
This had changed considerably in Lessons 6, 7, and 9 wherein Teachers T1, T3, and T2 took the roles as a learning observer and a supervisor while the students were accomplishing the cooperative inquiry tasks (Source A).
The quantum (q ij ) is calculated based on the current executed task source queue (whether it is from Q 1 or Q 2), and the round to be executed in, as following: .
No qualitative differences were observed between the ERP responses to task, source, and double switches within this period of time.
In connection with this, it is important to underline that in the match task, source and target were not similar, except for the attribute to match.
Fig. 3 shows the group averaged ERPs elicited by switch trials in task, source, and double switching blocks along with the ERPs elicited in no-switch blocks.
As expected, switch costs were observed in all switching blocks: switch trials were associated with more errors and longer response times than stay trials in task, source, and double switching blocks (paired t tests all p < .01).01
Participants took part in an experiment consisting of four tasks: rating source examples, selecting a source domain, explaining their selection, and designing a bus stop.
It is clear that a much greater proportion of the variance in the posited latent variable underlying any given task is attributable to task-specific sources such as experimental error rather than to a group factor.
