In description-based judgment tasks, framing a choice as 'accept' or 'reject' provokes well-described biases in choice behavior (Tversky and Kahneman, 1981).
In other words, one possibility is that three key economic suboptimalities catalogued in one-shot decision tasks—framing effects, endowment effects, and loss aversion are all 'rational' biases when a more ecologically valid task is employed, in which decisions do not all have independent consequences (Erev and Roth, 2014; Fawcett et al., 2014).
The Continental Congress gave Thomas Jefferson a difficult task: frame a vision of liberty and freedom that all could accept.
For example, in packet relay task, framing unit will start a route lookup event as soon as it receives the destination address of the relay packet.
To address these issues we conducted a laboratory experiment investigating how two aspects of the instructional environment, the task structure (tell-and-practice direct instruction vs. minimally-guided open-ended invention activities) and the task framing (mastery vs. performance), affected students' task-based mastery goal adoption and transfer when learning statistics.
If a task is framed to be neutral, stereotype threat is not likely to occur; however if tasks are framed in terms of active stereotypes, participants are likely to perform worse on the task.
It is no easy task to frame a budget shortly before a general election.
Contouring control problem is first formulated in a task coordinate frame.
To enhance engagement, both tasks were framed within a driving scenario in which participants were asked to imagine they were driving a vehicle to the university.
The recently developed global task coordinate frame (TCF) is utilized to synthesize a high-performance contouring controller with cogging force compensation for a linear-motor-driven biaxial gantry to test the practically achievable high-speed/high-accuracy contouring performance.
