For the Level 2 achievement test, the correlation coefficients for the paired/summary tasks and the summary/integrated tasks were found to be moderate and positive (.47 and.44), while the correlation for the paired/integrated task was weak and negative (−.10).
Pearson correlation on the individual facial expression recognition measures between the Hexagon and Animation tasks was weak (below.2).
We review previous research on sequencing effects and their potential application in Human-Computer Interaction, of which prior work has found mixed results regarding the influence of interaction sequence on preference – possibly because the magnitude of experiential changes caused by interactive tasks are weaker than those studied in psychological experiments.
Opaque schemes are more likely to be preferred to transparent ones when i) efforts on the tasks are highly complementary for the principal; ii) the agent's privately known preference between the tasks is weak; iii) the agent's risk aversion is significant; and iv) the errors in measuring performance on the tasks have large correlation or small variance.
The task was a weak isotonic contraction of the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle in the normal subject, and the left extensor carpi radialis brevis in the MM patient.
The strength was weaker for the triped (= quadrupedal) task than for the biped, clung and sat tasks.
If task representations are weak, this may also lead to errors as well as reduced error awareness.
It was found that for all the methods of laryngoscopy the practice effect was weak during the task as a whole, as assessed by the low r-value of correlation amongst try in the GEE and GLM models.
Where studies have administered multiple tasks to the same individuals, they have mostly found intercorrelations between tasks to be weak or absent, suggesting that multiple independent capacities are being tested (Boogert, Anderson, Peters, Searcy, & Nowicki, 2011; Isden, Panayi, Dingle, & Madden, 2013; Keagy, Savard, & Borgia, 2011; Keagy et al., 2009).
The public chose Natalie because she was weak, silly, incapable of completing the next ghastly task..
