Task success was defined as evaluation of successful completion of the task, process skill as evaluation of the procedure, time skill as the time required to complete the task, and knowledge as the objective assessment of conceptual understanding.
The criterion of average task success rate is defined as follows: {R}_{mathrm{Success}}=frac{{displaystyle sum_{i=1}^I{displaystyle sum_{j=1}^Jmathrm{Count}left({mathrm{Task}}_j^ikern0.5em mathrm{completed5em mathrm{completed} mathrm{successfully}right)}}}{{displaystyle sum_{i=1}^I{displaystyle sum_{j=1}^Jmathrm{Count}left({mathrm{Task}}_j^iright)}}} (26).
Ratings of task success paralleled heart rate.
Results indicate that IM-supported teams generated more ideas and task success.
Hence, also participants in the NFS group experienced success of self-regulation and they were positively reinforced for task success.
Task performance data includes all the information related to the tasks the participants performed, such as task success, task times, and task efficiency.
Performance metrics characterize what the user does and include measures such as task success, task time, and the amount of effort required to achieve a desired outcome.
The results show a significant improving ofdirect teleoperation, with higher task success rate and a task completion time similar to the one obtained when delays are not present.
This line of research looks at whether the way these avatar bodies look, and the way they are controlled, affects task success, liking and the sense of presence.
When systems presented more options per turn and avoided explicit confirmation subdialogues, both older and younger users booked appointments more quickly without compromising task success.
In two studies, we investigated the ability of a variety of structural and temporal measures computed from a web navigation path to predict lostness and task success.
