"task significance" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it to refer to the importance or value of a particular task or job. For example, "The task significance of this project is highly respected within the company."
Factor 5 (motivational) refers to personal job characteristics and core dimensions, such as job autonomy, task significance and recognition.
In Experiment 3, mere contact with beneficiaries and task significance interacted to increase persistence, mediated by affective commitment to beneficiaries.
Across three field studies, we find that CSR and task significance interact to predict OCB, such that an organization's CSR is more positively associated with OCB among employees who report higher task significance than among those who report lower task significance.
Survey of bank employees revealed an overall positive linear effect of age on work engagement; task significance was further positively related to work engagement.
Next, we develop a set of hypotheses concerning relationships among task significance, leadership climate, and hostility both within and across levels of analysis.
Also, enriched job characteristics (autonomy, complexity, and task significance) are more important in predicting change-oriented behavior, than un-enriched job characteristics (routinization and formalization).
With both kinds of tasks, significance levels were determined by calculating binomial z-scores corrected for continuity from the number of correct and false responses for each individual and condition.
This GLM design was used for a) analysis of group differences in brain activation during sequential motor tasks (significance threshold p < 0.05, FWE corrected), and b) for creating a whole-sample activation map during sequential motor tasks (p < 0.05, FWE corrected).
This task has significance in viral marketing, since the most influential entities can be targeted for endorsing new products in the market.
Moreover, the association of reduced prosociality with scores from a second mentalising task approached significance.
Most interestingly, when comparing low prosocials with high prosocials within the patient sample, we found a significant group difference with regards to the false-belief sequencing score (t = -2.041, df = 24, p =.05), while the group difference for the total sequencing and questionnaire score from the second mentalising task approached significance (t = -2.007, df = 24, p =.06).
