"task frequency" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to how often tasks need to be completed, or how frequently tasks are being performed. For example, "The task frequency for the project was three times per week."
Results provide conclusive evidence of the impact of required posture, force, gender and other variables on acceptable task frequency.
However, it remains unknown whether the effect originates from the task frequency per se, or from the rate of LF change (a prediction that could be derived from the minimum jerk hypothesis) which increases with both LF frequency and LF range.
Their task frequency is somewhere in the middle between nurses and physicians, with the time required for task completion also being in middle range.
Manual handling task frequency was assessed with an 8-item specially-developed instrument (total score 0 24 points).
The main reason for performing simulations was to control task frequency, duration, and environmental conditions such as ventilation and possible interferences from other sources of volatile compounds.
Lastly, the usual word frequency effect (high frequency words are pronounced more quickly than low frequency words) reversed in the regularize task for regular, but not irregular words, producing a significant interaction of task, frequency, and regularity.
The authors regard the respondents' reported task frequencies as trustworthy because the tasks refer to activities that are considered to be the core of their occupation.
Two laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate two objectives: (1) to study the effects of different mold heights and carrying distances on physiological responses, and (2) to determine maximum acceptable task frequencies (MAF) for metal pouring.
Persons >55 years of age were at increased risk for seropositivity, which cannot be explained by differences in specific cattle-related tasks, frequency of cattle contact, or hours worked.
At every workplace, an extensive work analysis is carried out to gather relevant data about respective manual handling operations (duration of tasks, frequency, force, posture, etc).. Based on this data, the KIM-MHO is then used by scientists and occupational health and safety officers seperately to assess the working conditions.
Tasks frequencies varied markedly according to training year (all p values after Kruskal-Wallis tests were smaller than 0.03), except for rinsing hair bleaches (p = 0.42).
