Sentence examples for tas p from inspiring English sources

Bmo-miR-10 and bmo-miR-14 showed a synchronized trend where a sharp increase at trachea appearing stage (TAS) (p = 0.0048 and 0.0031, respectively), NLS (p = 0.011 and 0.00007, respectively), and MLS (p = 0.012 and 0.0012, respectively).

A significant decrease in TAS (p < 0.001) was seen in the RDS group as compared to control.

Tumour invasive front vascular endothelia area was 2.15 times higher than that in tumour parenchyma and 4.61 times higher than that in TAS (P < 0.002).

In addition, median serum ferritin and mean serum transferrin increased from NGM to IGM and T2DM (P < 0.001 and P = 0.050, respectively), along with TAS (P < 0.001).

KRAS mutation was more prevalent in MSSs and TAs as compared to MSIs and SSAs (P < 0.01), whereas BRAF mutation was preferentially observed in MSIs and SSAs as compared to MSSs and TAs (P < 0.01).

where P ijk is the probability to select parking space j from location i to destination zone k with having observing PGI signs; U ijk (Tm, Tw, Ta, p) is the utility function of parking space j, %; θ is a scale parameter.

The HIV+ group was also impaired when assessing fine motor speed/dexterity in both dominant (D/GPB, p = 0.04) and non-dominant hands (ND/GPB, p = 0.01), psychomotor speed (TA, p = 0.01), executive functioning (CT2, p<0.01), and language (AF, p<0.01).

For example, multiple linear regression with GR t and the predictor values Ts, Ta and GR t -1 showed a positive significant connection (Rtotal = 0.94; Ts: p = 0.04; Ta: p = 0.18; GR t -1: p = 0.66), while a similar regressing with GR t and the predictor variables Tw, Ta and GR t -1 showed a negative significant relationship (Rtotal = 0.98; Tw: p = 0.04; Ta: p = 0.81; GR t -1: p = 0.36).

These data showed a significant positive relationship with Ta and a significant negative relationship with Pa Rtotal = 0.83; Ta: p = 0.03 Paa: = 0.05; GR t -1: p = 0.78; Fig 1b).

A model incorporating Ta, Pa and GR t -1 showed a negative effect of Pa on GR t (Rtotal = 0.77 Paa: = 0.07; Ta: p = 0.21; GR t -1: p = 0.09), while a model incorporating Tw instead of Ta further documented the relationship (Rtotal= 0.8; Pa: = 0.07; Tw: p = 0.17; GR t -1: p = 0.09; se also Fig 2c).

Testing the effect of season on average Tth per foraging stay and bee with anova (removing the effect of Ta and radiation) showed the same result (main factor season: P ≪ 0.0001, F-ratio = 247.07, d.f. = 1; covariate Ta: P ≪ 0.0001, F-ratio = 40.62, d.f. = 1; covariate radiation: P = 0.4224, F-ratio = 0.65, d.f. = 1; N = 345).