Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
In central vision, targets were preceded by colored cues designed to capture attention.
Specifically, Dehaene et al. [16] found that the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and the "lateralized bold response" revealed increased brain activity over the ipsilateral cortex when the targets were preceded by incongruent primes.
This interpretation lead to the prediction, tested in Experiment 3, that if non-dominant stress targets were preceded by nonwords homogeneous for stress, no decrement in performance should be found.
A further prediction, tested in Experiment 3, would be that if non-dominant stress targets were preceded by nonwords homogeneous for stress, no decrement in performance should be found.
These 8 critical targets were preceded by each prime type (novel, repeated, repeated/novel) 4 times, twice as congruent primes and twice as incongruent primes, for a total of 96 critical (analyzed) trials per block.
Similar(55)
Critically, the targets are preceded by a heavily masked prime stimulus that is either congruent with the target (i.e. both prime and target fall on the same side of 5) or incongruent (prime and target fall on opposite sides of 5).
Responses tend to be faster if the target is preceded by an alerting cue.
On exactly half of the target-present trials, the target was preceded by a cue.
The latter finding is consistent with some previous reports that showed a short lasting cueing effect when a target is preceded by a stimulus from the same general category [26] or a stimulus that shares target features [27].
Moreover, the target is preceded by one of three cue conditions: a valid cue, a spatially neutral central cue, a spatially neutral double cue, or a no cue condition.
The results clearly document the influence of object based attention on the P1 and show that amplitudes were larger for targets in the dominant (as compared to the non-dominant) hemifield, but only when the target was preceded by a tool in that hemifield.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com