Few tools in the literature target peer caring interactions, and which were either irrelevant to our research purpose or culturally inappropriate for nursing student population in Taiwan.
Jonny is back at Twickenham, primed for a hand-clasping, bent-kneed, target-peering showdown with his mini-me, Owen Farrell.
This causes a question on how each peer to trust a target peer in the P2P systems.
In addition, a teaching package was used to increase communication between the three participants and three selected target peers.
The teaching package consisted of the Teaching Interaction procedure, reinforcement, and priming of participants to demonstrate social skills and to engage with their target peers.
Prior to intervention, participants did not communicate or play with their selected target peer; after intervention, participants were able to increase the amount of play and communication.
Next, let us consider four peers shown in Figure 4. Here, a peer p r has a pair of neighbor peers p i and p k which are neighbor of a target peer p j.
Hence, the peer p r does not consider the trustworthiness T i (p i ) from the target peer p i to calculate the trustworthiness T r (p i ). Figure 1 Trustworthiness of peer.
The peer p i is excluded from N (p r ) since p i is a target peer, i.e. S = N (p r ) - {p i } = {p1, p2, p3, p4}.
The subjective trustworthiness ST k (p i ) shows how reliably a peer p i is recognized by a peer p k. Therefore, if a peer p r would like to get the trustworthiness of a target peer p i, the peer p r asks each neighbor peer p k to send the subjective trustworthiness ST k (p i ) of the peer p i.
After collecting the subjective trustworthiness ST k (p i ) on the target peer p i from every neighbor peer p k, the source peer p r calculates the trustworthiness T r (p i ) on the neighbor peer p i by calculating the average value of the subjective trustworthiness values: T r ( p i ) = ∑ p k ∈ T N ( p r ) - { p i } S T k ( p i ) | T N ( p r ) - { p i } | (2).
