Sentence examples for target no response from inspiring English sources

As a matter of fact, the acquired loss of expression of HER receptors may be an obvious mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy according to the simple paradigm 'no target, no response'.

Thus there were more words that needed to be rejected (non-targets require a NO response) as compared to words to be recognized (targets require a YES response) resulting in an unequal ratio of NO and YES responses.

Here again, subjects had a tendency to be better at responding on animal targets (go responses) than at ignoring non-targets (no-go responses) 96.4 vs. 93.1% (χ2, p<0.05, paired t-test, p = 0.054, t = 2.121).

In our study, we added another cue condition: watch-only, in which participants were only asked to watch the target with no response required.

Thus, the experiment included 40 compatible (same direction for prime and target arrows), 40 incompatible (opposite direction), 40 neutral (non-arrow prime stimuli followed by target arrows), 40 primed no-response (arrow prime stimuli but no target arrow) and 40 neutral no-response trials (non-arrow prime stimuli and no target arrow) and also 40 null events (fixation cross).

In case of perfect recognition, the ratio of target words (requested yes-response) and non-target words (requested no response) was 1∶2 [see also 31].

The task was modeled within the general linear model (GLM) framework, with only correct trials (i.e., target letters with button press and non-target letters with no response) included.

There were four types of possible behavioral responses: correct detection in target-present trials (Hit), incorrect responses in target-absent trials (False alarm), no response in target-present trials (Miss), and no response in target-absent trials (correct rejection [CR]).

When the target was an arrowhead the subjects had to press a button on the side the target pointed to; when the target was a circle, no response had to be given (Nogo trials).

Global-to-local interference refers to the difference in RT between NO-responses to global targets and NO-responses to stimuli containing no targets in the local condition.

Local-to-global interference refers to the difference in RT between NO-responses to local targets and NO-responses to stimuli containing no targets in the global condition.