Sentence examples for tangible dimensions from inspiring English sources
The phrase "tangible dimensions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing aspects or features of something that can be perceived or measured physically or concretely. Example: "The project aims to explore the tangible dimensions of community engagement and its impact on local development."
They will be asked by Archbishop Demetrios, the primate of the Greek Orthodox Church in America, for a design at once unmistakably ecclesiastical yet in harmony with the bold secular architecture around it, one that captures unearthly mystery in tangible dimensions and conveys a sense of something outside human experience.
A connected research question is whether the touchscreen shift in attribute focus to more tangible dimensions can be moderated by environmental variables.
Does the increased salience of sensory information engendered by touchscreen interfaces go away when there is little sensory information to be had, or does the mind elevate the importance of cursory tangible dimensions to compensate?
Assays of individual functions and whole-organism fitness are clearly quite different, but it is the latter, poorly measured property that ultimately determines both evolutionary success and the tangible dimensions of the niche.
Based on the results of our analysis, it is suggested that the differences in preferences stem from patients being more able to accurately imagine "non-tangible" dimensions of health states (anxiety or depression, and pain or discomfort) than the general population with less experience in various health states.
Alpha coefficients of assurance, responsiveness, empathy, reliability and tangibles dimensions were 0.79, 0.78, 0.79, 0.89 and 0.85 respectively.
The differences between negative quality gaps in each of the five SERVQUAL dimensions, except between assurance dimension and empathy and tangibles dimensions, were significant (p < 0.001).
Thus, the five SERVQUAL dimensions can be classified to three priority groups for allocation of resources and organizational attempts to eliminate or reduce negative quality gaps, so that the responsiveness dimension is placed in the first priority, the assurance, empathy and tangibles dimensions are placed in the second priority, and the reliability dimension is placed in the third priority.
These dimensions, with regard to negative quality gaps, can be classified into three groups, so that the responsiveness dimension is placed in one group, the assurance, empathy and tangibles dimensions are placed in another group, and the reliability dimension is placed in a third group.
The lowest gap of the quality relates to the tangibles dimension (gap mean score = -0.76).
Tangibles dimension, which was used to assess the structure domain was ranked third by respondents.
