Exact(2)
Therefore, applying Theorem 2.4 part (d) as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, and taking the solutions of (2.15) as values for parameters, we obtain that there exist positive profiles f i (i = 1, 2,..., k) solving (2.16) and satisfying (2.14).
(II) If α i < 0 and α i + β i > 0 (i = 1, 2,..., k), we can apply Theorem 2.4 part (c) as in the proof of Theorem 2.1 and taking the solutions of (2.15) as the parameters, we obtain that there exist compactly supports profiles f i (i = 1, 2,..., k) solving (2.16) and satisfying the boundary conditions (2.14). .
Similar(58)
The idea is to run a distributed optimization routine, taking the solution of (14) as the starting point, to solve for (6).
Step2: Take the solutions of (3) in the more general form: u ξ = a 0 + ∑ i = 1 m a i G ξ G ′ ξ i + b i G ξ G ′ ξ - i Open image in new window (4).
We suppose that (u^{0}_{1}(ageq00), (ageq0) is known, we take the solution of (2.7) as history function for (2.8) and we obtain nonnegative solutions if (u^{0}_{1}(a)) is not known.
We take the solution of reduced equations (B) of case (5) of Table 2 in the form F ( xi ) =sum_{i=1}^{m}a_{i} varphi^{i}, qquad H ( xi ) =sum_{i=1}^{m}b_{i} varphi^{i}, (31) where (varphi =varphi ( xi ) ) is a solution of the Riccati equation varphi '=q+varphi^{2}.
We take the solution of the u0 and u1 equations to have the form (41) u 0 = A ^ cos σ, (42) u 1 = m 1 sin 2 σ + m 2 sin 2 σ + m 3, where A = A ^ ϵ from (29) and (31).
If no censoring takes place, the solutions of (2) simplify to the well-known standard equations for the empirical mean and standard deviation of log10 D i,j.
Proof Firstly, we take the solution ω ( t ) of Eq. (3) and make an appropriate substitution for the variable x.
According to the discrepancy principle, we will take the solution (xi _{max}) of the equation rho xi_{max})=taudelta (3.5) to be the regularization parameter, where (tau>1) is a constant.
Take the solution and allow a couple of drops on each side of the swab.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com