Exact(5)
As we see clearly in Russell (1903), for instance, he takes propositions to have constituents.
Other versions of the view are defended by van Inwagen (2004), who takes propositions to be 0-place relations, and Speaks (2014a), who takes propositions to be monadic properties which are true iff they are instantiated.
One standard view of propositions takes propositions to be sets of possible worlds; another takes propositions to have something more closely resembling a linguistic logical structure (see structured propositions for a detailed exposition of this issue).
Soames, like Dummett, takes propositions to be types, not types of utterance but types of cognitive events of predication.
In appealing to a contents analysis, fundamentally an analysis that takes propositions to be the contents or 'objects' of belief and knowledge, as opposed to the objects themselves, i.e., material particulars or Forms, one allows that there is a path from belief to knowledge.
Similar(55)
(This is sometimes expressed by saying that variables range over propositions, or that they take propositions as their values).
All PC operators take propositions as their arguments, and the result of applying them is also in each case a proposition.
Versions of this view vary both according to which properties they take propositions to be, and what they take propositions to be properties of.
It has thus far been assumed that intuitions always take propositions as their objects.
But taking propositions to be truthbearers will not be to every truthmaker theorist's liking.
Adams suggests that someone might, à la Leibniz, take propositions to be thoughts in the mind of God.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com