The phrase "taken singularly" can be used in written English and is considered grammatically correct.
It is typically used to discuss individual elements or parts within a larger sentence or concept. Here is an example: "Taken singularly, each chapter of the book may seem disjointed, but when viewed as a whole, the story comes together beautifully."
Hence, the integral whole is not predicable of any one of its parts taken singularly.
IV, 24 25), according to which the Aristotelian principle applies only to complex knowledge and referring to humanity as a whole, although for each of us taken singularly the contrary is true, because the object of our simple and exhaustive knowledge (notita incomplexa perfecta) is the singular.
Several works indicate that the molecular response to the combination of heat and drought activates networks that are different from those activated by heat or drought stress taken singularly [ 12– 15].
Although bigger and more powerful drug cartels exist elsewhere in Mexico, Michoacan seems to stand alone as a place where the bad guys have singularly sought to take over political as well as law enforcement power.
That limitation hasn't stopped at least two U.S.-based companies from marketing such lie detectors, however, and "we take a singularly skeptical view of that," Mackintosh said.
Rather instinct will take over, singularly focused on ensuring a connection with their parent.
They told me, 'If you get lost, just keep playing the bridge from 'I Got Rhythm.'" From that somewhat awkward start, Juber quickly distinguished himself as a force to be reckoned with, one who took a singularly analytical approach.
Peter Hahn, a corporate governance expert at Cass business school, points out that over the past two decades, as non-executives have taken a pre-eminent role, they have singularly failed to prevent an explosion in executive pay.
However none of these factors seemed strong enough to translate into clinical practice, mostly because these response determinants singularly taken do not account of all responding (or resistant) patients.
Godard has put himself in a singularly unenviable position: he has taken the entirety of the cinema upon himself, has identified its survival with his own, has assumed the burden of its fictional forms like the mark of sin.
Strange then - as Jonathan Steele's book points out so well - that the hard analysis in which neoconservatism takes such pride was singularly lacking in the case of Iraq.
