take responsibilities for

USAGE SUMMARY

"take responsibility for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone is responsible for a certain action or result. For example, "As a leader, I take responsibility for the success of this project."

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

They need to take responsibilities for their actions".

Independent

And we need to take responsibilities for the kind of religion that we make".

The New York Times - Books

Set expectations that everyone (including yourself) should acknowledge, and take responsibilities for mistakes.

Harvard Business Review

For example, 'love will find a way' (and somehow nobody will really be hurt) and 'this is bigger than both of us' (so we don't have to take responsibilities for our own actions).

Independent

I'm the first one to take responsibilities for my players on the pitch.

BBC

Books can teach you, but you have to take responsibilities for your actions.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

"Take responsibility for yourself".

The New York Times

We take responsibility for that".

The New York Times

I take responsibility for them.

The New Yorker

I take responsibility for that.

The New York Times - Sports

I take responsibility for the game".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "take responsibility for" when you want to emphasize the act of accepting accountability for a specific outcome or action. It clearly indicates who is in charge of rectifying or managing a situation.

Common error

Avoid using "take responsibilities for" when referring to a general sense of duty or care. Instead, specify the exact actions or results for which responsibility is being assumed. For instance, "take responsibility for project delays" is more precise than a vague statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "take responsibilities for" functions as a verb phrase expressing the action of accepting or assuming obligations or duties for something. The examples Ludwig provides illustrate its use in contexts where individuals or entities acknowledge their role in managing or overseeing certain outcomes.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "take responsibilities for" is a grammatically acceptable phrase, although "take responsibility for" is more standard. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is mostly used in News & Media and Science contexts to indicate the act of accepting or assuming obligations for a specific outcome or action. Alternatives like "assume responsibility for" or "be accountable for" offer similar meanings with slight nuances. When writing, ensure you are specifying the particular duties or results that are being accepted to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be responsible for

States a general obligation to oversee or handle something.

assume responsibility for

Focuses on accepting a duty or task.

shoulder the responsibility for

Emphasizes bearing the burden of responsibility.

bear the responsibility for

Similar to 'shoulder', highlighting the weight of the obligation.

be held accountable for

Highlights being answerable for actions or outcomes.

take ownership of

Highlights claiming and managing something as one's own.

answer for

Focuses on the need to explain or justify actions.

be liable for

Emphasizes legal or financial obligation.

own up to

Focuses on admitting fault or responsibility.

be in charge of

Emphasizes having control and direction over something.

FAQs

Is "take responsibilities for" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "take responsibility for" is more grammatically standard and commonly used than "take responsibilities for".

What's the difference between "take responsibility for" and "assume responsibility for"?

Both phrases are similar, but "take responsibility for" often implies a more immediate and direct acceptance of accountability, while "assume responsibility for" can suggest a longer-term or more formal acceptance of a duty.

How can I use "take responsibilities for" in a sentence?

You can use "take responsibilities for" to indicate that someone is accepting accountability for specific duties or outcomes. For example, "The manager must take responsibilities for the team's performance".

What are some alternatives to "take responsibilities for"?

Alternatives include "be responsible for", "be accountable for", or "assume responsibility for", which all emphasize different aspects of accountability and duty.