take property for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "take property for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the act of acquiring or seizing property, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The government has the authority to take property for public use under certain conditions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The takings clause is uncontroversial when it is used to take property for public purposes like roads and schools.

The New York Times

Giving the D.E.P authority to take property for nonpayment should be a last resort.

The New York Times

On July 30, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that under Michigan's Constitution, which has the same language as New York's, cities cannot take property for private development just because it might be more economically productive as something else.

The New York Times

New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled earlier this year that the state could use eminent domain to take property for Columbia University's planned 17-acre adjunct campus, which would include 17 buildings for science, business and arts education and faculty housing north of 125th Street, near the Hudson River.

The New York Times

It is historically a more recent development than and differs in motive and degree from "expropriation" or "eminent domain," which is the right of government to take property for particular public purposes (such as the construction of roads, reservoirs, or hospitals), normally accompanied by the payment of compensation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The Legislature has passed statutes that are too vague to constrain cities from taking property for private parties.

The New York Times

In both American and Chinese law, "just compensation" is required when the government takes property for a public purpose.

The New York Times

"It is a limited role and is consistent with the notion that taking property for public purposes with compensation does not violate property rights".

The New York Times

He said, "We're not envisioning taking property for widening the road," referring to the long-established line of small homes that face Avalon Harbor and Stamford Landing across Southfield Avenue.

The New York Times

Because of its powerful influence, Dominion, a private corporation, can invoke eminent domain to take property from landowners for pipeline rights-of-way, such as the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline.

Huffington Post

How may a private company take property from hundreds of citizens for its personal gain?

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the acquisition of property, use more precise verbs like "acquire", "seize", or "expropriate" to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the vague verb "take" when a more specific verb would better convey the intended meaning. Using "take" can leave room for misinterpretation about the manner in which the property was acquired.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "take property for" functions as a verb phrase, aiming to describe the action of obtaining property for a particular purpose. However, it is considered grammatically ambiguous. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is not correct, suggesting it lacks clarity and context.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "take property for" is deemed grammatically questionable by Ludwig AI due to its lack of precision. While its intended meaning revolves around acquiring property for a specific reason, a more descriptive verb like "acquire", "seize", or "expropriate" is recommended to enhance clarity. Common contexts include news reporting, encyclopedia articles, and scientific discussions. Remember to consider context and choose the best wording to avoid ambiguity, as highlighted by the writing guidance and alternatives provided. By doing so, writers can enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of their communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acquire property for

Emphasizes the act of gaining possession of property for a specific purpose.

seize property for

Highlights the act of taking possession forcefully or legally.

expropriate property for

Focuses on the government's power to take private property for public use.

requisition property for

Suggests taking property temporarily for military or public needs.

appropriate property for

Implies setting aside property for a specific purpose.

commandeer property for

Suggests seizing property for military or emergency use.

claim property for

Focuses on asserting a right to property for a particular reason.

confiscate property for

Emphasizes seizing property as a penalty or punishment.

assume control of property for

Highlights gaining management or oversight of property.

take ownership of property for

Clarifies the action of becoming the owner of property for a defined reason.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "take property for"?

Consider using more precise phrases like "acquire property for", "seize property for", or "expropriate property for" to convey the specific action of obtaining property.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "take property for"?

While technically grammatically incorrect, the closest scenario where you might find a similar expression is in legal or historical contexts discussing eminent domain, where the government might "take property for" public use.

Is "take property for" grammatically correct?

The phrase "take property for" is not considered grammatically ideal. It's better to use more specific verbs that clearly express the method of property acquisition.

How does the meaning of "take property for" differ from "acquire property for"?

"Acquire property for" implies a legal or consensual transfer of property, whereas "take property for" can suggest a more forceful or unilateral action. Using acquire property for enhances clarity.