take on operations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "take on operations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to assuming responsibility for or managing specific tasks or functions within an organization or project. Example: "The new manager will take on operations for the entire department starting next month."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

NATO leaders endorsed measures to improve NATO's ability to take on operations when and where necessary, committing themselves to be able at all times to deploy and sustain larger proportions of their forces on operations in order to ensure that NATO has a permanently available pool of assets and forces that can deployed.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

But it has been deliberately slow in taking on operations of its own in Iraq, Afghanistan and other hot spots, as Mr. Rumsfeld directed.

The New York Times

Back in the late 1990's, when the consortium took on operation of Terminal 4, trends in the airline industry were pointing to larger numbers of foreign travelers using Kennedy.

The New York Times

While details are still to be worked out, under one scenario envisioned by the Cuomo-empaneled MorelaNew York Power Authorityork Power Authority could take on the operation of LIPA during a transition period.

Huffington Post

Uber will focus on its transportation service and building better relationships with those in its two-sided marketplace of drivers and passengers, while Fair will take on the leasing operation.

TechCrunch

"When member states take on some of these operations under multinational force arrangements, they usually go in with much larger forces," Mr. Annan said today.

The New York Times

"Will the private sector operation take on the same sort of risks that the RAF, the Royal Navy and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency do, on the same scale?

BBC

Another change at the club has seen Mick Horton take on the post of football operations director and club secretary.

BBC

Otto Schiff identified two other nonprofit groups, Jewish Care and World Jewish Relief, to take on its operations and began selling off the homes.

The New York Times

The Obama administration, meanwhile, was internally split and reluctant to take on military operations in a third Muslim nation while still deeply involved in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The New York Times

On bed-blocking, it says the number of days lost is higher than previously thought, which is forcing the NHS to turn to the private sector to take on planned operations such as knee and hip replacements.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "take on operations", clearly specify the type of operations being assumed (e.g., military, business, humanitarian) to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example: "The company decided to take on international operations to expand its market share".

Common error

Avoid using "take on operations" without defining the scope or scale of the operations. This can lead to confusion and misinterpretation. For example, instead of saying "The department will take on operations", specify "The department will take on daily operational tasks" to be more precise.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "take on operations" functions as a verb phrase indicating the act of assuming responsibility for and managing specific tasks or functions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

33%

Science

17%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "take on operations" is a versatile phrase that means assuming responsibility for and managing specific activities. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It is commonly used in news, formal business settings, and scientific contexts. Alternatives such as "assume responsibility for operations" or "undertake operations" can be used depending on the desired level of formality. When using the phrase, it's best to clearly define the scope and type of operations to avoid any ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assume responsibility for operations

Replaces "take on" with "assume responsibility for", emphasizing the acceptance of duties.

undertake operations

Uses "undertake" instead of "take on", suggesting a more formal initiation of activities.

manage operations

Focuses on the management aspect of operations, replacing "take on" with "manage".

handle operations

Emphasizes the handling or dealing with operations, rather than just assuming them.

engage in operations

Highlights active participation in operations, shifting the focus from responsibility to action.

execute operations

Focuses on the execution or carrying out of operations, implying a more hands-on approach.

conduct operations

Similar to "undertake operations", but with a slightly more formal tone.

oversee operations

Stresses the supervisory role in operations, implying a higher-level perspective.

initiate operations

Highlights the beginning or starting of operations, rather than the ongoing management.

become responsible for operations

Expands the phrase to explicitly state the transition to a responsible role.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "take on operations" in a formal context?

In formal contexts, consider using alternatives like "assume responsibility for operations", "undertake operations", or "manage operations".

What does it mean to "take on operations"?

To "take on operations" means to assume responsibility for and begin managing or executing specific tasks, processes, or activities within an organization or project.

Is it correct to say "taking on operations"?

Yes, "taking on operations" is the gerund form of the phrase and is grammatically correct when used as a noun. For example: "Taking on operations required significant planning and resources".

How does "take on operations" differ from "conduct operations"?

"Take on operations" emphasizes the assumption of responsibility, whereas "conduct operations" focuses on the actual execution or performance of the tasks. One precedes the other: you take on operations, and then conduct them.