take cost of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "take cost of" is not correct or usable in written English.
In this context, the correct phrase is "take charge of." For example, "After John graduated from college, he decided to take charge of his own life and career."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

"I would never award the standard executive stock option again," Mr. Jensen declared, acknowledging that he had failed to take cost of capital into account in his original formulation of pay for performance.

The New York Times

Despite fragility, percentages of success take, cost of treatment and long-term tendency to contracture, this surgical technique has been developed in few burn centres.

Transfusion Clinique et Biologique

One of the harsh realities for us as borrowers is that although federal student loans have more flexibility than a lot of kinds of debt do, they don't take cost of living into account or people who have extraordinary expenses like high medical bills.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Current technology and especially Artificial Intelligence effectively increase productivity and take cost out of operations in the Manufacturing sector.

Procedia Engineering

Financial advice website NerdWallet took cost of living into account when it created its list of the 10 best cities to retire released earlier this month.

Huffington Post

Managers also used the merger to take costs out of the new entity.

The Economist

"We're going to play offense and defense, and focus on continuing to take costs out of the business".

The New York Times

Additionally the developed model takes costs of outpatient care, costs for monitoring the patients and equipment costs into account.

Health Economics Review

Sensitivity analyses was carried out taking costs of intervention equivalent to two family practice consultations per year and 20% of a single family practice consultation per year.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

"I like [the idea of an ICO] because it just takes cost out of my system.

TechCrunch

"At Archant it isn't simply about taking cost out of business, it is about growth.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing expenses, use precise and grammatically correct phrases like "account for the cost", "consider the expense", or "factor in the price" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Don't use the phrase "take cost of" in formal or professional writing. It's grammatically awkward and can confuse your audience. Choose established and clear alternatives instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "take cost of" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a defined function in standard English. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as not correct. The similar examples found through Ludwig often aim to express consideration or management of expenses.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "take cost of" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard English. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase lacks proper grammatical structure. While the intention behind its use is often to convey the consideration or management of expenses, clearer and more established alternatives like "account for the cost", "consider the expense", or "factor in the price" should be used instead. These alternatives ensure clarity and professionalism in both formal and informal communication. The contexts in which the phrase appears are varied across News & Media, Science and Wiki but due to the incorrectness its use should be avoided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

account for the cost of

Emphasizes including the cost in a calculation or plan.

factor in the price of

Similar to "account for", but more informal and emphasizes integration.

consider the expense of

Replaces "take" with "consider" to emphasize the act of thinking about the cost.

bear the cost of

Highlights who is responsible for paying the cost.

absorb the expense of

Focuses on managing or mitigating the financial impact of the cost.

assume responsibility for the cost of

Highlights acceptance of financial obligation.

handle the finances of

Implies managing costs as part of a broader financial role.

address the expenditures for

Focuses on dealing with costs in a structured or formal way.

manage the budget for

Emphasizes overseeing and controlling costs within a financial plan.

shoulder the burden of cost

Emphasizes the responsibility and weight of financial obligations.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to the phrase "take cost of"?

While "take cost of" isn't grammatically correct, you can use alternatives like "account for the cost", "consider the expense", or "factor in the price" depending on the context.

Is "take cost of" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "take cost of" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use more precise and established alternatives.

How can I use "consider the expense of" in a sentence?

You might say, "When planning the project, we need to "consider the expense of" materials and labor." This is a clearer and more professional way to express the idea.

What is the difference between "account for the cost" and "take cost of"?

"Account for the cost" is a grammatically sound phrase that means to include the cost in a calculation or plan. "Take cost of" is not a standard English phrase and should be avoided.