We ran MatInspector on these shuffled datasets in the same way as we had with the real sets and tabulated for each dataset the number of predicted sites found for each matrix family.
The dataset tabulated in Additional file 2 was generated by a computer simulation in the course of this work.
An example of a one-dimensional dataset, tabulated in Additional file 2 and shown in Figure 1, illustrates a difficulty with such construction.
Results were tabulated for the datasets collected from the repositories.
Actually, the low quality data used by these authors correspond to the datasets tabulated in the work by Buchanan et al. [ 2].
The testing results are obtained with all the eight recording sessions (S01 to S08), using a leave-one-out criterion, averaging over all the testing dataset, and tabulated with the population standard deviations.
To determine the dominant serovar(s) in this dataset, we tabulated which serovar(s) contributed the maximum titer score for each sample with one or more titer ≥ 1 800 (Table 3).
Multiple gene expression profiles for a gene were reduced to a single profile for each gene symbol by selecting only the highest normalised mean gene expression value from C2C12 differentiation dataset and tabulated tissue specificity index.
Datasets were tabulated and analysed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA).
The common pathways identified by each method in each of the datasets were tabulated.
