In Ivermectin, the survival and fecundity of the LE populations did not differ significantly from that of C populations (Fig. 1c and 1f; Table 1, effect of selection regime).
In the Control environment, survival and fecundity of individuals from LE populations was not significantly different from that of individuals from C populations (Fig. 1b and 1e; Table 1, effect of selection regime).
Populations evolving in Levamisole had higher survival and fecundity in this environment than populations evolving in a Control environment (Fig. 1a and 1d; Table 1, effect of selection regime).
Otherwise as in Table 2. Outcomes of selection on the fermentation yield of proto-codes randomly initiated with equal probabilities of glycine and alanine.
Risk of bias for each study is shown in Table 2. Risk of selection bias was low in all included RCTs.
Additionally, some systems provide a list or table of symbols for selection, but finding the desired one is a time-consuming task.
Using (1-½ ρ)(1- F) predicted losses in genetic variance observed in Table 4 from the accuracies of selection presented in Table 1 gives a very close approximation.
Regions with selection signatures were discovered from a scan across the genome for both ancestral and recent signatures of selection (Table 1).
With the slopes in Table 2, the effect of selection on viral PU values is small relative to BC→T.
In the pith, we observed differences in DIMBOA, PCA, and DFAT concentrations between cycles of selection (Table 4).
