Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
To extend the thinking for these experiments towards application to terrestrial hydrothermal systems, we compared ionic (SDS) and non-ionic (Triton-X-100) surfactants to a complex organic extract derived from pine needles (Experiment set #5, Figure 5).
To gain an understanding of these systems we compared the carbohydrate-degrading potential of these bacteria as shown in Table S3.
As for the artificial systems, we compared here performances of the differential and integral inference models.
Because the 2 surveillance systems we compared both relied on medical record discharge diagnoses, they were not independent, and we could not perform a capture/recapture analysis.
In ART facilities with electronic ART data systems, we compared patient retention as determined by electronic cohort report versus paper-based pharmacy records.
After summarizing these systems, we compared them within the context of this new surveillance framework and outlined goals for future development and research.
Similar(46)
In order to provide a benchmark for regional innovation systems we compare both success and non-success stories.
In addition, we visualize the information captured in the extracted expression patterns from SPEX and the two systems we compare with, by computing the SVD of the expression patterns (Pan et al., 2006).
For the transformations of these three systems, we compare the performance of sesTI with 1) TI calculations based on Δ A estimates from the 12 individual MD trajectories and 2) Δ A from averaging over these 12 TI simulations, namely the IT-TI approach.
To evaluate Hypothesis 1 (i.e., that racial/ethnic minority youth would be comparatively over-represented in the juvenile justice system), we compared the racial/ethnic demographics of the relevant metropolitan area to the representation in this probation sample.
To further support the role of a co-catalyst of Fe2O3 in our system, we compared the photocatalytic activity of Fe2O3/BiVO4 and Co3O4/BiVO4 in degrading phenol.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com