Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
"Every day the N.S.A. pored over new ideas for cryptographic systems submitted by would-be innovators in the field," Levy writes.
However, there are specific differences that make each system distinct: The systems submitted by the ELiRF-UPV group (D-ELiRF-UPV-Post + DTW and E-ELiRF-UPV-Post + DTWNorm) differ in the cost matrix used within the S-DTW search.
The main difference between the systems submitted by groups 1 and 2 is that the former detects the music class better than the latter while the latter detects the speech classes slightly better than the former.
The systems submitted by the L2F group (B-L2F-4-pllr fea + DTW fusion and C-L2F-4-likel fea + DTW fusion) show the most significant differences, both in the feature extractor, the DTW search, and the systems that are fused.
The systems submitted by the SPL-IT-UC group (F-SPL-IT-UC-4-phnrec + DTW fusion, G-SPL-IT-UC-3-phnrec+DTW fusion, and H-SPL-IT-UC-2-LIphnrec + DTW fusion) differ in the number of subsystems that are used for the fusion.
We evaluated only systems submitted by manufacturers to the bid process, thus limiting the generalizability of our results to other devices.
Similar(54)
In this study the authors describe the system submitted by the team of University of Szeged to the second i2b2 Challenge in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data.
The results of the QbE STD evaluation are presented for every system submitted by the participants along with the system applied on STD in terms of MTWV and ATWV in Tables 6 and 7 for training/development and test data, respectively.
There were also some systems submitted to the query-by-example STD and keyword spotting tasks.
We have presented the four systems submitted to ALBAYZIN 2012 Query-by-Example Spoken Term Detection evaluation along with a system that conducts STD.
Despite the significant improvement obtained by the systems submitted to this second evaluation compared to those of the first evaluation, results still show the difficulty of this task and indicate that there is still room for improvement.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com