These features are the phonology (sound), morphology (system of word formation), syntax (patterns of word arrangement), and semantics (meaning).
Happy word fluency was significantly lower than that of neutral word fluency but significantly higher than that of sad word fluency, suggesting a moderating effect of positive affective systems on word production or fluency.
In both cases, we soon realise we are within a system of words performing very defined tasks, albeit ones only understood by initiates.
But while fathoming the shipping forecast can be achieved relatively quickly, initiation into the system of words Beckett was working with in the mid-1960s is more complicated, not least because the system was corrupted, a failure, as were all the systems Beckett devised during his long career.
The language with which they are described is so fragmented that it is difficult to orient ourselves: we are in a system of words where multiple paths of meaning branch from every sentence, not on the level of interpretation but of basic comprehension.
For example, at the strata of lexicogrammar, the linguist is interested in viewing language as a system of wording and as such, the categories which are relevant at this stratum are those relating to the grammatical properties of language.
By cross-system association of word forms and concepts, and development of a higher-order semantic circuit, the degree of overlap between the widely distributed DNA/TCs is reduced (from 66 to 33%% in the example).
The features used in our systems include bag-of-word, orthographical information, morphological information, part-of-speech (POS), document structure information, domain knowledge and WR features.
The novel subword approach outperformed the system performance of word-, syllande-, and phoneme-based units.
Moreover, for the language-dependent systems, results have also shown performance differences between systems that employ fusion of word transcription- and template matching-based systems, and systems that do not.
