There is a limited evidence-base on the influence of GHIs on health systems of conflict-affected countries.
The health systems of conflict-affected states are characterized by a series of weaknesses, some common to other low and even middle income countries, others specifically conflict-related.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analytical review on the influence of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance on health systems of conflict-affected countries.
The aim of this study is to explore the influence of two leading GHIs, the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance, on the health systems of conflict-affected countries.
The aim of this study was to explore the influence of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance on health systems of conflict-affected countries.> -wrap-foot>> Financial data source is OECD Creditor Reporting Systems (http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=CRS1).
Key strengths of the Global Fund and the GAVI Alliance on health systems of conflict-affected countries include: improvements in immunisation coverage, increased financing for health system components such as human resources, improved availability of health information, and greater civil society participation.
The Indian subcontinent comprised another system of conflict focused on border disputes among India, Pakistan, and China.
Unlike most multicellular organisms, a Dictyostelium FB can be composed of multiple clones, and it has emerged as a model system of conflict and cooperation (Strassmann and Queller 2011b).
Research in the field of executive functions has mainly focused on a more implicit system of conflict and error monitoring supported by the posterior medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) (e.g. Ridderinkhof, van den Wildenberg, Segalowitz, & Carter, 2004), rather than the explicit monitoring and control associated with metacognition (see Fleming and Dolan (2012) for a review).
