Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
This procedure reveals that the number of PS genes on the X chromosome is not significantly small (p = 0.25 when controlled for anatomical systems, and p = 0.32 when controlled for cell types).
On the other hand, we find a slightly significant deficit of PS genes on the Y chromosome (p = 0.015 when controlled for anatomical systems, and p = 0.05 when controlled for cell types).
Similar(58)
In recent years, many authors have studied the existence of nontrivial solutions for Laplacian systems and p-Laplacian systems, see [1 5] and the references therein.
More recently, some authors discussed the multiplicity of nontrivial solutions for Laplacian systems and p-Laplacian systems, see [6 12] and references therein.
OBH was crystalized as monoclinic system and P 121/n1 space group with molecular weight of 254.25.
Table 1 Spring mass dashpot system (SMD system) and P controller Behavior End effector Arm Forearm Mean value SMD system 0.0252 0.0257 0.0248 0.0252 P controller 0.0759 0.0759 0.0759 0.0759.
The number of users is assumed to be K=10 in this system, and P cir=1W, σ U =σ D =σ ik =1.
u v+b represents the displacement column vector of the system, and P v+b represents a load column vector.
Paired t-tests show that the improvement of this system over the rest is, in general, statistically significant for short-length terms (p < 10−2 over the fusion system and p < 10−6 over the rest), for medium-length terms (p < 10−6 over all the systems except the fusion system), and for long-length terms (p < 10−4 over the fusion system, p < 10−3 over the W1B-HTK system, and p <10−5 over the rest).
where P is the number of tracks recommended by the system and P a is the number accepted by the user.
We say that the set S^{(2)} {P,varGamma }triangleqlim_{lrightarrow 0}{S^{(2)} {P,varGamma,l }}= {P,varGamma,0 } is a centered surround system and P is the center of the system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com