Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
systematically different from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "systematically different from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing two or more items, indicating that they differ in a consistent or methodical way. Example: "The results of the experiment were systematically different from the previous studies, suggesting a need for further investigation."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Cells from the 1-cell stage were systematically different from all other cells because of the differences in experimental conditions (Guo et al., 2010).
Science
It finds that men typically leave the labor force for reasons systematically different from the reasons that women do.
News & Media
Renewable energy views in counties with proposed or operating wind farms are not systematically different from those in other counties.
This helps to mitigate the problem that our sample may be dominated by transnationally active migrants who are systematically different from the rest of the population.
Additionally, it is well documented that patients who consent to participate in the controlled framework of a clinical trial may be systematically different from the general population [25].
We do not know if the characteristics of non-responding EDs were similar or systematically different from those of responding EDs.
The result has shown that intonation patterns of beginning-level L2 English produced by Vietnamese speakers are systematically different from those of native English speakers, which can be transferred from their native tone language.
A natural concern with this model is that cities with large immigrant populations may be systematically different from cities with small immigrant populations in ways that affect women's family and work decisions for reasons unrelated to childcare markets.
Science
The results showed that F0 patterns of beginning-level L2 English are systematically different from those of native English speakers, which can be transferred from their native tone language.
It is possible that study participants are systematically different from those who did not participate.
Science
NFPs that did participate may have been systematically different from those that did not.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "systematically different from", ensure you clearly define the system or method by which the difference is determined to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid exaggerating the importance of systematic differences. Ensure the differences have practical or theoretical relevance before highlighting them as significant. Not every difference is meaningful.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "systematically different from" functions as a comparative element, highlighting a consistent and patterned distinction between two or more entities. It's used to show that differences are not random but follow a specific method or system. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.
Frequent in
Science
87%
News & Media
7%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "systematically different from" is a grammatically sound and commonly used comparative expression. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to highlight patterned or methodological distinctions, frequently in formal and scientific contexts. High-quality sources show consistent use in academic research and other fields. While related phrases offer nuanced alternatives, the key is to ensure clarity about the system or method causing the difference.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
consistently distinct from
Focuses on the consistent nature of the difference.
markedly dissimilar
Emphasizes a noticeable degree of difference.
appreciably distinct
Highlights a difference that is easily perceived or measured.
categorically unlike
Stresses a fundamental and absolute difference.
demonstrably disparate
Indicates that the difference can be clearly shown or proven.
methodically divergent
Suggests that the difference arises from a planned or structured process.
regularly differentiated from
Highlights that the separation or distinction occurs on a regular basis.
variably distinguished from
Indicates that differences can exist based on chosen variables.
contrastingly individual
Emphasizes the contrasting nature of the individual characteristic.
distinctively unique from
Highlights that the differences make each element unique.
FAQs
How can I use "systematically different from" in a sentence?
You can use "systematically different from" to compare two or more things, indicating that they differ in a consistent or methodical way. For example, "The results of the new study were systematically different from earlier findings.".
What's a good alternative to "systematically different from"?
Alternatives include "consistently distinct from", "markedly dissimilar", or "appreciably distinct", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.
When is it appropriate to use "systematically different from" instead of "different from"?
"Systematically different from" is appropriate when the differences are not random but follow a clear pattern or are caused by specific, identifiable factors. Using just "different from" implies a general dissimilarity without necessarily indicating a structured variation.
Is there a risk of bias when comparing groups that are "systematically different from" each other?
Yes, if groups are "systematically different from" each other, there's a risk of selection bias or confounding. It's crucial to identify and account for these systematic differences in your analysis to avoid drawing invalid conclusions.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested