systematic review

USAGE SUMMARY

"systematic review" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a method used by researchers to collect and analyze information from existing research on a topic. For example, "The research team conducted a systematic review of existing papers to identify the major trends in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Systematic Review.

Nature

a systematic review.

Nature

Results from a systematic review.

Nature

Design: Cochrane Systematic Review.

Neuromuscular Disorders

systematic review of the literature.

Harvard University

Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017067514.

Harvard University

This approach is called a systematic review.

The Guardian

Design: Systematic review.

Physical Therapy in Sport

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Nature

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nature

A systematic review of neuropsychological findings.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing a "systematic review", ensure you clearly define your search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria to maintain transparency and replicability.

Common error

Avoid stating you conducted a "systematic review" without detailing the databases searched, keywords used, and criteria for selecting studies. Lack of detail undermines the review's credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "systematic review" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as a subject or object in a sentence. As Ludwig highlights, it's used to describe a specific type of research methodology. For example, "This is a systematic review of existing systematic reviews."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

Academia

30%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "systematic review" is a noun phrase denoting a rigorous research method used to synthesize existing knowledge. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, clarity regarding the review's methodology is crucial. Alternatives include "literature review" or "evidence synthesis", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to clearly define your search strategy for enhanced credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

literature review

Focuses specifically on reviewing existing literature on a given topic.

structured review

Highlights the use of a defined methodology.

evidence synthesis

Highlights the act of combining various pieces of evidence.

research synthesis

Emphasizes the combination of different research findings.

meta-analysis

Implies a statistical analysis of multiple studies.

integrative review

Highlights the integration of different perspectives or findings.

scoping review

Describes a preliminary assessment of the potential scope of research.

critical appraisal

Emphasizes a detailed evaluation of the evidence.

overview of reviews

Indicates a summary of multiple reviews.

comprehensive assessment

Focuses on providing a broad and thorough evaluation.

FAQs

What is a "systematic review" and how does it differ from a regular review?

A "systematic review" uses a rigorous and transparent methodology to identify, select, and synthesize all relevant studies on a specific topic, minimizing bias. Unlike a regular review, it involves a predefined search strategy and explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria.

How do I conduct a "systematic review"?

Conducting a "systematic review" involves defining a clear research question, developing a search strategy, screening studies for eligibility, extracting data, assessing the quality of evidence, and synthesizing findings. Resources like the Cochrane Handbook can guide you.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "systematic review"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "literature review", "evidence synthesis", or "meta-analysis".

Why is it important to register a "systematic review"?

Registering a "systematic review" in a registry like PROSPERO helps to avoid unintentional duplication, increase transparency, and reduce bias by documenting the planned methods before the review is conducted.