Therefore a systematic nomenclature (naming process) has been developed.
The first method is based on the system used by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and is often referred to as systematic nomenclature.
This example, among others, demonstrates the urgent need for a systematic nomenclature taking the structure-function relationship into account.
With the present paper we therefore propose a systematic nomenclature for the comprehensive description of protein species.
Because there is currently no systematic nomenclature available for the exact description of protein species, we present such a nomenclature.
The main variability between annotators in the SACEM class assignment was found for hybrid mentions comprising a combination of different sub-parts of the mention (typically systematic nomenclature, formula and abbreviations).
Conventional chemical nomenclature is a means of specifying a chemical structure in words, and systematic nomenclature provides an unambiguous description of a structure, a diagram of which can be reconstructed from its systematic name.
The term "protein species" [2], in this sense, is central to the new paradigm and the application of the protein species concept enables the development of a systematic nomenclature required for a comprehensive understanding of different functions of a protein.
Synonyms were collected from public sites (such as PubChem, ChemSpider, ChEMBL, ChemIDPlus, and ACToR), migrated from approved source lists, entered by members of the DSSTox curation team, and generated using systematic nomenclature software.
Attempts to tackle the problem of chemical entity recognition have invariably identified that the problem is not amenable to pure dictionary approaches due to the continuing discovery of novel compounds and the many ways in which systematic nomenclature allows compounds to be named [2].
