Sentence examples for systematic evaluation frameworks from inspiring English sources
The complexity and ramifications of the fast-growing number of mobile users and the variety of services intensify the interest in developing principles, algorithms, design methodologies, and systematic evaluation frameworks for the next-generation wireless networks.
This paper provides a systematic evaluation framework for comparing model transformation approaches, based upon the ISO/IEC 9126-1 quality characteristics for software systems.
These question-based nonspatial assessments use a systematic evaluation framework to consider exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.
Knowledge-driven disease risk mapping should therefore be performed as part of a formal and systematic evaluation framework that takes into account the relative contribution each factor makes to the overall estimation of suitability.
In addition to providing practical guidance to the users of the ChIP-seq technology, our systematic evaluation framework is also a useful reference to the developers of improved algorithms.
In addition to revealing valuable information to the users of this technology about the characteristics of the binding site detection approaches, the systematic evaluation framework provides also a useful reference to the developers of improved algorithms for ChIP-seq data.
The second goal was to develop a comprehensive and systematic evaluation (CASE) framework to identify model strengths and weaknesses.
Although different approaches for evaluating and comparing models have been proposed, systematic evaluations of frameworks are under-represented.
This paper proposes a systematic risk evaluation framework for one of the most significant impact events on an interim dry storage facility, an aircraft crash, by using a probabilistic approach.
The comprehensive and systematic process evaluation framework outlined by Saunders et al [ 68] and initially proposed by Steckler and Linnan [ 69] has been adapted for the HDHK community process evaluation.
Online survey of health RCS funders, implementers and evaluators about health RCS evaluation frameworks (response rate 25/48, 52%), to supplement those above and those identified in a systematic review (Cole et al. 2012 ).
