Sentence examples for systematic differences which from inspiring English sources

Given differences in the experiments, we used Distance Weighted Discrimination (DWD) [ 17] to minimize systematic microarray data biases attributable to RNA source, different analysis laboratories, different microarrays, or other systematic differences which include sex and strain in this case.

However, different scanning platforms can introduce systematic differences which confound true effects of interest.

These two groups could have had unmeasured systematic differences, which could have biased the results.

The first set of analyses examined 1) the correspondence between regional tissue volumes derived from data collected at 1.5 T and 3.0 T and 2) whether there were systematic differences for which a correction factor could be determined and applied to improve measurement agreement.

Also, the demographic and reproductive health characteristics of these three groups were compared to assess whether systematic differences exist which might be explained by differential health-seeking patterns.

This threat acknowledges that populations sampled, and the methods by which they are recruited and assessed, could result in systematic differences between cohorts, which could confound inferences drawn from analyses of combined data.

Emissivity and 1-R (R is bi-conical reflectance) show systematic differences under vacuum, which is already extensively discussed in the literature (cf. Salisbury et al. 1994).

Following quantile array normalization to correct for systematic differences between arrays, which do not represent biological variation of interest between experimental groups (Bolstad et al, 2003; Chudin et al, 2006), mean signal intensities for each miRNA were compared across DRGs obtained from tumour-bearing mice (n = 3) to the sham group of mice (n = 3).

An analysis of 5 systematic reviews on NPWT showed differences (which mainly concerned non-RCTs) in the citation and selection of primary studies.

However, the different results for different sub-populations more likely to illustrate the manner in which systematic differences in the new and old RI populations may conditionally affect QTL detection.

It is these systematic differences among scientific disciplines, which are unrelated to the quality or the size of the field, that make it impossible to directly compare impact factors of journals from different fields [4] [6].