Sentence examples for systematic as opposed from inspiring English sources

Arising from a systematic, as opposed to narrative, literature review of 236 publications published over a period of 38 years from 1977 to 2014, the paper examines the factors affecting the physical, chemical, mechanical, permeation and compositional properties of recycled aggregates sourced from construction and demolition waste, intended for concrete production.

These so-called systematic (as opposed to stochastic) errors have been known about for a long time in the field [ 10, 11], and are expected to be also present, in fact even enhanced, in a phylogenomic context [ 1, 12].

Select "Clear Playlist" (as opposed to "Cancel").

This is confirmed by the validation set: for example, the results in Table 3 show that the strategy with highest precision had a relative recall of 89.2% against the 130 trials included in the three most recent systematic reviews, as opposed to 76.0% against the 233 trials included in the earliest four systematic reviews.

In this manner, the development of ECC with special attributes or functions can be attained in a rational and systematic manner, as opposed to by trial-and-error.

In each case it was shown how the use of optimization techniques helped in "homing in" on the desired alternatives in a systematic way as opposed to time and labor intensive trial and error approach.

By definition, underreporting represents systematic error, as opposed to day to day variation and other random sources of error.

Reviews were classified as systematic reviews (as opposed to narrative reviews) if multiple sources were searched (at least MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library), and the search strategy (including the search date) was documented [ 12].

Although well-established, the berrypicking approach now commands particular attention as a potential first-line procedure for systematic reviews, as opposed to previously being conceived as a "safety net".

As such, if there were systematic differences as opposed to chance differences between respondent and non-respondent chiropractors surveyed in a given region, the results obtained would not be generalizable to the entire population of chiropractors in that region [ 55].

The BioInitiative report was not a systematic review, as opposed to the work of IARC and ICNIRP, and has therefore been criticized for the selective and incomplete use of the literature [ 13].