Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We analyzed data for 1487 faculty members of UFG, including the total number of papers published between 2011 2013, a weighted-index of scientific production and the number of publications in high-ranked journals (according to a Brazilian system of journal ranking in different areas).
Similar(55)
This cross-sectional survey assesses views concerning the review system of biomedical journals among academics globally.
Female academics, experience of personal attacks and imposition of unnecessary references by reviewers were related to disagreement about fairness of the peer review system of biomedical journals.
The primary hypothesis was that most academics would agree that the current peer review system of biomedical journals is fair, transparent and scientific.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted separately to assess the individual associations of demographics and academic backgrounds, with attitudes towards fairness of the peer review system of biomedical journals.
The aim of this study was to assess views about the peer review system of biomedical journals among academics from high-ranking universities as determined by the Times Higher Education Quacquarelli Symonds (THE-QS) World University Rankings globally.
In order to develop the two automated systems, large amounts of journal articles have to be manually classified.
Specifically, we give an answer to an open problem mentioned in Hu and Wang [T. Hu, Y. Wang, Optimal allocation of active redundancies in r-out-of-n systems, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (2009) 3733 3737].
But Prof Fouchier questioned whether a system of asking scientific journals to censor Durc work is ever workable or even appropriate.
Fewer than half of the respondents agreed that the peer review systems of biomedical journals were fair (48.4%), scientific (47.5%), or transparent (25.1%).
Given the need for good quality research in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, it is important to refine the peer review systems of our journals.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com