For each cluster (mathfrak{C}) in the system the following set of indicators is defined: (a) For products (mathrm{I} ={i:i=1,ldots,I}), (b) For transport (mathfrak{J}={ j:j=1,ldots, J}), (c) For clinics (mathrm{K} = { k k=1,ldots, K } ).
An indicator system consisting of a very large number of indicators is difficult to handle in terms of reporting requirements, trade-offs between indicators and consideration processes in politics.
The definition of the indicator system and composite indicators is completed providing guidelines that establish how to use these tools in tourism sector planning.
Several agreed systems of health indicators are currently in use.
Although this system of indicators can be accessed as such, its use in practice faces a number of difficulties, from at least two points of view: too many indicators and data are available at very different periods (terms).
The general system of social and economic indicators is designed and established in the initial phase from a specific sub-sector approach and includes subtypes of indicators such as: national accounts and finance, population and social conditions, industry, trade and services, agriculture, forestry and fishing; international trade, transport, environment and energy, science and technology, etc.
One of the problems identified in the survey was that data required for even crude health systems performance indicators were of poor quality and potentially misleading.
The system of indicators needs to be further streamlined and additional training is required.
In this paper, a multi-stage processing system for flexible calculation of urban land cover indicators is presented and applied to a study area in Munich, Germany.
Also the functions that are associated with system of indicators characterizing their implementation were highlighted.
